W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2011

Re: [css3-speech] voice-pitch

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:37:24 -0700
Message-ID: <4E1DD7D4.7000903@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/13/2011 10:26 AM, Daniel Weck wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2011, at 17:56, Daniel Weck wrote:
>> Okay, let me publish an update to the pitch properties, where the CSS notation is aligned with SSML's calculation method.
>> I will then ask the CSS syntax / parsing gurus to review the correctness of the prose. :)
> Could you please review the updated prose:
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-props-voice-pitch
> The pitch-range definition of percentages is identical:
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-props-voice-pitch-range

Looking good! The only comment I have left is:

   voice-pitch: 5%;
   voice-pitch: 5st;
   voice-pitch: 5Hz;

The <frequency> is the only one that's absolute rather than relative
when specified alone. It seems to me it'd be more consistent, and
less confusing, if we switched therefore to having <frequency> be
relative by default unless an 'absolute' keyword were specified.

What do you think?

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 17:37:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:01 UTC