- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:37:24 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/13/2011 10:26 AM, Daniel Weck wrote: > > On 13 Jul 2011, at 17:56, Daniel Weck wrote: >> Okay, let me publish an update to the pitch properties, where the CSS notation is aligned with SSML's calculation method. >> I will then ask the CSS syntax / parsing gurus to review the correctness of the prose. :) > > Could you please review the updated prose: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-props-voice-pitch > > The pitch-range definition of percentages is identical: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-props-voice-pitch-range Looking good! The only comment I have left is: voice-pitch: 5%; voice-pitch: 5st; voice-pitch: 5Hz; The <frequency> is the only one that's absolute rather than relative when specified alone. It seems to me it'd be more consistent, and less confusing, if we switched therefore to having <frequency> be relative by default unless an 'absolute' keyword were specified. What do you think? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 17:37:54 UTC