- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:49:52 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/06/2011 09:13 AM, Daniel Weck wrote:
> This is a good suggestion. Let me know if the (updated) prose that
> specifies how to handle positive versus negative <numbers>
> in the <frequency> definition is good.
a) You need to update the examples, since voice-pitch: relative -2st;
is no longer valid.
b) Are you sure voice-pitch: 2.5st; should be valid?
c) Are percentages actually useful here? (I think they're definitely
useful for voice-pitch-range, but I can't see the use case for
voice-pitch.)
~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 21:50:20 UTC