- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:54:51 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org style" <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Please have a look at the updated prose: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-props-voice-family On 6 Jul 2011, at 20:20, Daniel Weck wrote: > Another point to consider is that children's voices often sound very > feminine. So when the author's preference is "male 10 year old", a > reasonable system match for the specified voice characteristics may > well be "Lucy: female [20-45] years old". > /Daniel > > On 6 Jul 2011, at 20:10, Daniel Weck wrote: > >> On 6 Jul 2011, at 18:20, fantasai wrote: >>>> Since we explicitly leave the matching algorithm up to the >>>> synthesizer it >>>> might even be necessary to write something like: >>>> >>>> voice-family: 60 male, 60 female, 30 male, 30 female; >>>> >>>> The intent here is to prefer a mature male voice if one is >>>> available, with >>>> a mature female next, followed by an adult male etcetera. >>>> Essentially trying >>>> prioritize age over gender. >>> >>> What happens if I have a male voice that's 55 years old? Do I use >>> that, or >>> fall back to 60-year-old female? >> >> Well, a concrete voice instance available on the user's system is >> likely to support an age range. So your example would actually be >> more accurate as such: I have a "male voice suitable for 40-50 >> years old", which would not get selected based on the author's >> criteria "60 male" (nor would it based on any of the other author- >> provided alternatives). >> >> So I think we are missing prose similar to font-family for defining >> the mapping between a generic voice-family and "best-match" >> candidates on the user's system: >> >> --- >> User agents should provide reasonable default choices for the >> generic font families, which express the characteristics of each >> family as well as possible within the limits allowed by the >> underlying technology. >> User agents are encouraged to allow users to select alternative >> choices for the generic fonts. >> >> --- >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#generic-font-families >> >> >> >> > > Daniel Weck > daniel.weck@gmail.com > > > Daniel Weck daniel.weck@gmail.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 19:55:31 UTC