- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:12:57 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org style" <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
I agree. Fixed in the latest editors' draft. /Daniel On 30 Jun 2011, at 02:10, fantasai wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#cue-props > > # When a user agent is not able to render the specified auditory > icon, > # it is recommended to produce an alternative cue. (e.g. popping up a > # warning, emitting a warning sound) > > ... > > # If the URI resolves to something other than an audio file, such as > # an image, the resource is ignored and the property treated as if it > # had the value ‘none’. > > I don't think these behavior should be different. Consider: suppose > the > cue resolves to an audio resource, but the UA doesn't recognize the > resource. Is an alternative cue played, or is the cue silent? > > If the UA can't play the specified URI for *any* reason, it should > do X. > That simplifies the expected behavior and avoids any ambiguities > deriving > from the exact conditions of why the UA can't play the specified URI. > > Also wrt "warning sound", I suggest that X be either > - no cue > - an alternative cue, such as a bell > and not > - an alternative cue, such as a warning sound > since I believe there should be no expectation that the following > content > indicates a problem. :) > > ~fantasai > Daniel Weck daniel.weck@gmail.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 16:13:26 UTC