- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:57:25 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday, July 01, 2011 3:18 PM fantasai wrote: to editors drafts in all working drafts > <snip/> > CSS Fonts etc > ------------- > > jdaggett: glen adams from samsung has objected to any kind of same > origin > restriction > jdaggett: need to resolve whether the same origin restriction is > removed > from the CSS3 Fonts spec > jdaggett: propose this as s topic for next week > sylvaing: there is an organization that has normative dependencies > on CSS3 > working drafts; it's a problem > sylvaing: They're objecting to what they see as breaking changes It's true that there has been a claim made that there are organizations that have normative dependencies on CSS3 Fonts; however, there have not been any reference cited to substantiate it. So far, what was offered [1] are the links to ATSC and DVB-MHP standards documents [2] and [3] that normatively reference CSS2, and the follow up search came up with no normative references to CSS3 Fonts WD. Thank you, Vladimir [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0619.html [2] http://www.atsc.org/cms/standards/a100/a_100_2.pdf [3] http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102700_102799/102727/01.01.01_60/ts_102727v010101p.pdf > kimberlyblessing: Comcast is also in this group. I'm trying to > explain as > much as I can to the team how W3C works > glazou: would help to have a liason person communicate with this > group > jdaggett: how can they refer to the CSS3 Fonts spec? It used to be 2 > specs > (fonts, and Web Fonts), and @font-face used to be in Web > Fonts > sylvaing: we have to resolve a hard dependency here, since there may > be a > breaking change here > sylvaing will keep the WG informed >
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 16:57:50 UTC