- From: GreLI <greli@mail.ru>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:40:45 +0300
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:08:26 +0300, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote: > 2. Change the property name to 'border-frame' or > 'border-image-frame', and the related sub-properties to match. (Credit > for the 'frame' nomenclature goes to Peter Gasston[3].} Because that's > more like what the properties do, at least as specified. While I don't > think this name would be immediately intuitive, it would be a lot less > counter-intuitive: authors would be less likely to approach the property > thinking, "Oh, cool, images for borders! Let's run this star around > this div!" and then be completely stumped by the resulting behavior. How about naming current border-image to "border-style-image"? It will extend border-style like background-image and accompanying properties extends background-color. For now border-style is implicitly overridden. And this is very confusing because default border-width applies even to parts of border not supposed to be affected by border-image. E.g. I want border-image for top and bottom border and get image parts in corners because left and right borders suddenly exists. "border-image" instead can be defined somewhat like background-image but limited by border frame in cases like "round".
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 09:41:34 UTC