- From: Shropshire, Andrew A <shropshire@att.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:47:06 -0500
- To: "'Boris Zbarsky'" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks Boris for the information. It appears that this proposal also falls short too. I read: "This specification does not define how the UA decides to persist the stylesheet set or whether or how to persist the selected set across pages." It needs to, otherwise "alternate" style sheet idea should probably be stricken from the spec as it adds complication with little benefit. Regards, Andrew Shropshire AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. 703-506-5708 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are AT&T property, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:54 AM To: Shropshire, Andrew A Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Making alternate stylesheets more useful + site selectors On 1/21/11 11:45 AM, Shropshire, Andrew A wrote: > Thanks Boris for the idea. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/alternate/ > This link describes it. It looks very complicated. That's because they're trying to create something that works in all browsers, etc, and assuming all they have to work with are the old DOM specs. See http://hixie.ch/specs/css/dom/altss/altss for a spec proposal for making all this much simpler. Gecko has implemented this for years; I believe so has Webkit. It's too bad it never got standardized... -Boris
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 11:47:40 UTC