W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

RE: [css3-flexbox] Argh, architectural problems

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:51:13 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2AAE0662@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

It'd be *very* nice to have a clear set of layout use-cases the module is supposed to solve. I don't know how we can get to something that 'feels' right without that. If we don't spell those out clearly - or worse, don't even agree on what they are - 'blue-sky theorizing' is indeed likely to be a significant part of what we'll achieve.

Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 19:51:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian Manthos: "RE: [css3-background] 'background: url(foo) white' and 'background: url(foo), white'"
Previous message: Brian Manthos: "RE: [css3-background] 'background: url(foo) white' and 'background: url(foo), white'"
In reply to: Tab Atkins Jr.: "[css3-flexbox] Argh, architectural problems"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css3-flexbox] Argh, architectural problems"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css3-flexbox] Argh, architectural problems"
Reply: Andrew Fedoniouk: "Re: [css3-flexbox] Argh, architectural problems"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:55 UTC