- From: Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:31:48 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Greetings, Apologies if this has been addressed, but my searches of the archives came up dry. Please point me to the resolution if I missed it. I'm wondering if the current value definitions of 'animation' and 'transition' are problematic. Each one allows any number of comma-separated shorthand values, but that's not what concerns me. Here's what 'animation' allows for each comma-separated bit: <animation-name> || <animation-duration> || <animation-timing-function> || <animation-delay> || <animation-iteration-count> || <animation-direction> And for 'transition': <'transition-property'> || <'transition-duration'> || <'transition-timing-function'> || <'transition-delay'> The differences in quotation-mark usage in is the originals, but that's also not what concerns me. What concerns me is this: animation: rocker ease 3s 5s; transition: fade 0.25s 0.5s linear; How can UAs know which time value is the delay and which is the duration? As far as I know, '||' still means "any number of these can occur in any order" (see http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-syntax/#property-def-value). -- Eric A. Meyer (eric@meyerweb.com) http://meyerweb.com/
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:32:22 UTC