W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] intuitivity and width computation rules

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:39:24 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vo9ffy1gbunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:16:04 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> Ah.  Row backgrounds aren't painted on the row itself, just on the cells  
> originating in that row, if any.  This part _is_ specified in CSS 2.1.  
> ;)  See section 17.5.1.

Doesn't seem very clear to me. For instance:

"A 'missing cell' is a cell in the row/column grid that is not occupied by  
an element or pseudo-element. Missing cells are rendered as if an  
anonymous table-cell box occupied their position in the grid."

Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 18:39:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:54 UTC