W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] intuitivity and width computation rules

From: Rob Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:06:56 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2F3F40.30307@boogdesign.com>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Yes, but the _row_ widths are still the same, right?  Unless Rob was 
> actually looking at cell widths when he thought he was looking at row 
> widths?
I was determining the width of the element by setting a background 
colour, and the background colour of the first and last divs only 
extends one cell across, I hadn't really understood your earlier comment 
about anonymous boxes.  I wouldn't have hit the problem in the first 
place if I'd realised I could apply the display: table directly to the 
second row in the first place, I just was trying to understand what was 
going on.

Now that I have a better context the spec is making more sense to me. 
I'm going to stop sidetracking this thread now, when I next hit a wall 
of understanding I'll start my own thread for it :)

Thanks for all the help.

Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 18:07:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:54 UTC