- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:38:49 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On 01/12/2011 09:06 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:20 PM, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 01/10/2011 03:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> Agreed. The spec explicitly says that the BPA of the root element is >>> specially defined. It could probably use a bit of clarification in >>> background-clip, just appending ", and thus background-clip does not >>> have any effect when specified on it." to the end of the first >>> sentence in that note. >> >> The background-clip property doesn't exist in CSS2.1, so I think it >> would be rather incongruous to add such a phrase to the end of that >> sentence. > > Hm? I was talking about the line in B&B in the definition of background-clip. Well, the only quoted spec references and quoted text in the thread was from CSS2.1, so I assumed you were talking about the quoted text from CSS2.1. I think I see the note you're talking about in CSS3. Updated. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 00:39:25 UTC