- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:01:21 -0800
- To: Rafal Chlodnicki <rchlodnicki@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Rafal Chlodnicki <rchlodnicki@opera.com> wrote: > Given examples: > linear-gradient(top left, black, white) > linear-gradient(left top, black, white) > > if following citation from CSSOM spec again: > > "Where multiple CSS component values can appear in any order without > changing the meaning of the value (typically represented by a double bar || > in the value syntax), use the order as given in the syntax." > > both of these examples should have "linear-gradient(top left, black, white)" > computed value as gradient syntax specifies them in that order: > > [ [top | bottom] || [left | right] ] Ooh, good example. I don't think that that CSSOM clause applies, actually (these aren't component values, they're function arguments), but they should indeed serialize the same way. I'll modify the serialization algorithm to reflect that. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 18:02:14 UTC