- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:25:37 -0800
- To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > Assume the following gradients: > > background-image: radial-gradient(contain, white 99%, black 100%); > background-image: radial-gradient(contain, white 100%, black 100%); > background-image: radial-gradient(contain, white 100%, black 101%); > > Fiddle for easy testing: http://jsfiddle.net/leaverou/qBurF/ > > The 1st and 3rd are rendered consistently in Gecko and Webkit and are just > what somebody would expect. > The 2nd has a rendering that's very disconnected from the 1st and 2nd > examples: It's a solid color, black in Minefield (which I is probably a bug, > so I reported it) and white in Webkit. I assume Webkit's rendering is > consistent with that the spec defines (although I couldn't find any explicit > instruction in Image Values), and it makes sense as it's consistent with how > linear gradients or other kinds of radial gradients should display. However, > in this case it's not what a designer would expect (which is a solid > ellipse) and it will make interpolation look weird. The expected rendering > could be useful for some cases, whereas a solid color could be easily > achieved in other ways. Both browsers are being buggy in some way. Firefox is correctly rendering #1 and #3. Webkit *would* be rendering #1 and #3 correctly if it implemented elliptical gradients (<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52639>). Both are rendering #2 incorrectly - it should look almost exactly the same as the other two, with a white inner ellipse immediately changing to black. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 18 February 2011 16:26:30 UTC