W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [css3-animations] Ease animation modes under-specified.

From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:17:02 +1100
Message-Id: <E4UMGL.YSKKVIHE4TPL@abbra.com>
To: Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style@w3.org
Hi Jon,

--Original Message--:
>On 14 February 2011 16:09, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>> These are exactly the same as the values used for transition-timing-function:
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#transition-timing-function_tag>.
>> The draft should be updated to reflect this, I agree.
>> Simon
>The definition of the animation-timing-function property in section
>3.4 of the WD already contains the following:
>"The Ħanimation-timing-function˘ property describes how the animation
>will progress over one cycle of its duration. See the
>Ħtransition-timing-function˘ property [CSS3-TRANSITIONS] for a
>complete description of timing function calculation."
>And section 2.1 has a link to 3.4 for more information. Seems adequate?

Indeed yes, in an obfuscated way.

Makes me wonder why these specs aren't combined into one in that case.
It's not very D.R.Y. the way these two specs repeat the same
information and one must reference the other to get the
required data.

Thanks for pointing that out.


Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 00:17:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:56 UTC