- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:52:31 +0000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- CC: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Brad Kemper:] > For myself, it is not all that unusual to find myself creating zero height > blocks (with content in them) for one reason or another. I think columns > should not be prevented from having zero width or a couple pixels of width > when there are enough columns to do so (not infinite). It may end up being > a very useful technique. I want to emphasize my intent has never been to prevent such scenarios. I just prefer when defaults are set up in such a manner as to make the primary use-case easier to achieve. So the claim is not that there shouldn't be a min-column-gap behavior. Just that this may not be a suitable default for overconstrained cases given the main use-case for multicols.
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 15:53:04 UTC