- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:03:14 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 10, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > While it can be argued to be what the author wanted - the > column-width is auto but column-count and column-gap are explicitly > specified so the algorithm makes every effort to honor the author's > request That's the argument that seems most compelling to me. > - I'm not sure this is helpful as it means column-width:auto > might yield poorer result when, for instance, the user snaps/tiles > his window to half the screen space. If I had 10 auto-width columns that got very narrow when the window got half as big, then at least it is not at all surprising. I wouldn't want my values ignored because the browser thought it knew better than to give me what I asked for. I should have thought of the ramifications before I tried to squeeze so many columns into a flexible-width layout. And isn't that what media queries on width are for?
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 02:03:56 UTC