Well, yet another option is to honor both column count and column gap and to simply produce overflow. That may not be that bad -- in a way you would treat column-gap as padding (it never shrinks and it can overflow). Also, if a column-min-width is eventually introduced it makes perfect sense to have min-content-width = min-column-width * column-count + column-gap * (column-count - 1) multicol content just can't be more narrow than that... -----Original Message----- From: Håkon Wium Lie [mailto:howcome@opera.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:20 PM In pracice, this would probably be discouragement to using column-count (at least for values of, say, 4 or more) and a corresponding encouragement to use 'column-width'. That's good, I think.Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 21:30:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:56 UTC