- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:09:47 +0100
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:
> Ah, I see, after you fix line 24, changing line 17 to "<=" makes no
> difference when zero-width columns with their gaps fit precisely
> into the width.
Right.
> I may have missed the discussion that led to lines 23-26 though.
> That part of the algorithm takes off at the point where nothing
> fits at all and tries to give priority to column gap over column
> count, which leads to a transition from 3 zero-width columns to 2
> usable columns. 2 columns could be useful, but if you have to hit
> zero first I find that questionable...
But implemenations have to deal with zero-width columns anyway; if you set:
column-count: 999999999
or something, you will effectively have zero-width columns.
Given that we clip columns, I think it's managable.
Another alternative is to try find some minimal column width, as
suggested here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0434.html
However, I don't see any simple ways to improve such overconstrained
situations. Feel free to propose something, though.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:10:25 UTC