- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:09:47 +0100
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky: > Ah, I see, after you fix line 24, changing line 17 to "<=" makes no > difference when zero-width columns with their gaps fit precisely > into the width. Right. > I may have missed the discussion that led to lines 23-26 though. > That part of the algorithm takes off at the point where nothing > fits at all and tries to give priority to column gap over column > count, which leads to a transition from 3 zero-width columns to 2 > usable columns. 2 columns could be useful, but if you have to hit > zero first I find that questionable... But implemenations have to deal with zero-width columns anyway; if you set: column-count: 999999999 or something, you will effectively have zero-width columns. Given that we clip columns, I think it's managable. Another alternative is to try find some minimal column width, as suggested here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0434.html However, I don't see any simple ways to improve such overconstrained situations. Feel free to propose something, though. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:10:25 UTC