Re: Repeating gradient syntax question

On Feb 8, 2011, at 12:41 am, Fraser Pearce wrote:

> On 7 Feb 2011, at 19:05, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> In earlier discussion on this list, I argued for using different gradient functions for things which cannot be interpolated for animation. That's why we have the 'repeating' versions of the gradient functions.
>> 
> 
> Can you point me to that conversation so I can read the back story please. 

The thread including <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0226.html>.

Simon

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:00:49 UTC