- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:44:21 -0800
- To: Scott Sheehan <scottsheehan@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Scott Sheehan <scottsheehan@gmail.com> wrote: > Minor nit: > > For the box-align and box-pack property values "start" and "end", it seems > to me that start/finish, begin/end are the logical pairings of words. (I'd > just use top/bottom/left/right, or if you really want to share values for > vertical & horizontal orientations, then front/back seem ok for box-pack -- > can't think of any pair good for box-align). box-pack is supposed to be similar to text-align, which is why it has the same values (just logical, rather than physical). I agree that also using start/end for box-align was a bad choice, since it's always perpendicular, and thus before/after would be better choices, but luckily this is moot now anyway, as my new draft strips this property down to only handle baseline alignment. front/back is an interesting suggestion for flex-pack, though. I'll have to think on it a bit to decide if it's worth breaking the text-align symmetry just to avoid mildly abusing the logical direction keywords. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 17:45:13 UTC