- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:36:43 -0800
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > On 8/02/2011 3:26 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> >> On Feb 6, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Simon Fraser<smfr@me.com> wrote: > >>>> I actually have no idea how a gradient should respond to slicing >>>> for border-image. WebKit has bugs, but I'm not sure what the >>>> expected behavior is. >>> >>> A gradient is an image, and once it's used, it has a definite >>> size. It should act exactly like any other image of that size. >>> There's no magic behavior here. >> >> Actually, I'm not seeing anything in Backgrounds& Borders 3 that >> says how to dimension an image that has no intrinsic dimension. It >> should be the same size as the border image area[1]. Maybe we need to >> say that somewhere, or say it more explicitly if it is implied in >> there somewhere and I'm just missing it. > >> 1. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#border-image-area > > > Brad, gradients work the same as background-image. I discovered it only today. As Tab has said, there no magic behavior here. This is possible. I meant with regard to border-image.
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 17:37:18 UTC