- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 19:49:31 +0200
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
[nitpicker's corner]
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Päper
<christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote:
> So the discussion is about how this should be marked up …
> I <x id="read-1">read</x> it.
> #read-1 {phonemes: rɛd}
assuming id= parses the way id parses in xhtml, this would be bad
because it would mean i could not write:
I <x id="read-2">read</x> it to Jim. She <x id="read-2">read</x> it to Jim.
> I <x class="read-simple-past">read</x> it.
> .read-simple-past {phonemes: rɛd}
I'd rather <x class="read simple past">
> … and consequently which of these CSS should support and thereby encourage?
Ignoring all the other technical problems, support for multiple
classes is I believe a theoretically solved problem.
Personally, I like http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/route#Pronunciation
as a problem word. I speak en-US and you can see that we get two
pronunciations; I use both.
Received on Sunday, 6 February 2011 17:50:04 UTC