W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [CSS3-UI] text-overflow:ellipsis (freshly rewritten/expanded and incorporated into editor's draft)

From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:19:47 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTOihOW+cFfOd0Cmr65XKm4rTK+BBeKZwJLdOY@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 00:27, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 19:04, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
>> wrote:> The effect of
>> > text-overflow:ellipsis on lines whose line boxes are not direct children
>> > of
>> > the block box(es) with text-overflow is currently undefined.
>> I think this *is* actually both well defined (if indirectly) and
>> interoperable. That is, the effect of the definition in the spec is
>> that *only* the direct block element parent of line boxes can affect
>> the text-overflow behavior of those line boxes since text-overflow is
>> not inherited by default (and each block element potentially sets its
>> own dimensions and overflow).
> Ah, but what about anonymous block boxes?

Their presence should not affect text-overflow behavior.

> E.g.
> <div style="text-overflow:ellipsis; overflow:auto; width:10%; height:100px;
> border:1px solid black; font-size:16px;
> white-space:pre;">Hello<div>XYZ</div>Kitty</div>
> Here, the nearest ancestor block boxes containing "Hello" and "Kitty" are
> anonymous. It looks like IE9 and Opera apply text-overflow to those words,
> but Webkit does not.

Great example / test case.

Confirmed that IE9 and Opera interop on this, and IMHO do the right
(predictable and expected) thing.

Thus I've incorporated a version of the example (including testing a
nested element) into the editor's draft as well as tightened up the
spec language accordingly.




http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 04:21:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:55 UTC