- From: Jon Ronnenberg <jon.ronnenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:56:36 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPEZGVsx3VAsNoTYjB-Z0MSEWP5yh6tNi7oH6B0xVPmpHgrDYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi group. The transition shorthand property<http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#the-transition-shorthand-property-> is neither intuitive or very short when it comes to defining several CSS properties. E.G. transition: background-color 1s ease, color 1s ease; A far more intuitive approach would be to define several properties in the [<‘transition-property’> part. I.E. transition: background-color, color 1s ease; As the Draft elaborate on transition-property; Value: none | all | [ <IDENT> ] [ ‘,’ <IDENT> ]* it is fair to assume that this is also true when it comes to the shorthand method. It is noted (in the Draft) that the first value that can be parsed as a time is assigned to the transition-duration. Hence allowing multiple properties before transition-duration should not break existing implementations. ** DISCLAIMER: I'm not a spec implementer but a front end developer (web author). Any difficulties in parsing the above proposal haven't been considered thoroughly. This discussion is only tested on the FF9 and WebKit 535.7 implementations. Cheers, Jon. PS. Sorry if this is a re-post. I didn't subscribe properly the first time I emailed.
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2011 15:57:08 UTC