- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:24:26 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:03 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > It looks weird if I punch in > Outset: -10 -50 2 4 > Inset: 40 40 10 10 Oh, duh, I did something dumb. When searching for the longest path, I just found the largest value, not the largest absolute value. Your example is much less dumb-looking now. > Maybe taking the longest route for inset and outset independently > would be better? (So your pacing attribute can change from outset > to inset.) My code was already doing this (it was just doing it incorrectly when negative values were involved). > Also I'm wondering if blur and spread should be added together to > find the distance that they contribute. Or indeed whether spread > and the offsets should be added together to find that distance. That's interesting. I'd have to play with it a bit to figure out how it looked. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 23:25:22 UTC