- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:11:59 -0500
- To: Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com>
- CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 06/01/2010 07:18 AM, Paul Duffin wrote: > My mistake, I read it too quickly and thought they all said "...is the same as the first." > > I think I have been spending too much time reading these specifications as I noticed that this phrasing was different from the phrasing used on the other properties and so assumed that it behaved differently too. > > Is there any particular reason why it does not use the same phrasing as the edge shorthands, which seems to be clearer (at least to me) than the current phrasing? Nope. Fixed by using "left/bottom/right/top" instead of "fourth/third/second/first" and tweaking sentences a bit to hopefully make it less awkward. :) http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-slice http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-width http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-outset for comparison http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-width Let me know if you have other suggestions for improvement. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:12:45 UTC