- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:32:20 +0100
- To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Morten Stenshorne:
> > > "When the multi-column element is paginated, only the last row
> > > of column boxes is affected by 'column-fill'."
> > I like your proposed text, and I think we should use it.
>
> This doesn't really make sense to me - neither the proposed text here,
> nor what the spec currently says.
>
> <div style="columns:3; column-rule:1px solid; column-fill:auto; orphans:0; widows:0;">
> <div style="break-after:page;">line<br>line<br>line</div>
> <div style="break-after:page;">line<br>line<br>line</div>
> <div style="break-after:page;">line<br>line<br>line</div>
> </div>
>
> Should we really forcefully balance the columns on the two first pages
> here?
So, you are saying the the spec shoul not use terms like "not being
affected", but rather about what the behavior should be? That makes sense.
How about:
"When the multi-column element is paginated, this last row of
columns are formatted according to the computed value of this
property; other columns are formatted as if 'column-fill:
auto' had been set."
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 18:33:09 UTC