- From: Brian <irishb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:53:30 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 13:54:06 UTC
Thanks for everyone's input so far. Christoph, you're right in that with device and display width and height queries, it's possible to determine form factor. I suppose my issue lies in that we have to rely on something other than a given value for "device-type" to determine the device type. I would argue that the "intuitive factor" is greater in simply typing device-type="handset" or "tablet", rather than writing out device width/height queries. Thanks everyone! -- Brian Irish On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Christoph Päper > <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote: > > Brian: > >> Smartphones will likely have resolutions that will either rival or > >> supersede present-day laptop resolutions, so our approach of detecting > >> screen resolution and/or pixel density will be useless as a means to > detect > >> form factor. > > > > Um, if I’m not mistaken, the device and display width and height queries > would work just fine with physical units (‘mm’, ‘cm’, even ‘in’, ‘pt’, > ‘pc’) if they’re not affected by the fixed 96px = 72pt (= 1in = 25.4mm) > ratio required elsewhere (font size etc.). > > They work the same, with the fixed ratio. Anything else would be > *ridiculously* confusing. ("I set up a media query asking if the > screen is 10in wide, and then set the body's width to 10in! Why is it > overflowing?") > > ~TJ > >
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 13:54:06 UTC