- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:17:04 +0100
- To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Cc: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, "arronei@microsoft.com" <arronei@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Stephen Zilles:
> I do not believe that Vincent concluded that exclusions between
> columns is not in scope. What is not in scope is positioning
> because that is the topic of other specifications.
I think it makes sense to discuss positioning along with regions and
exclusions. The use cases for CSS Regions (and exclusions) all use
positioning, I believe:
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions/regions-use-cases
Can you think of a use case for regions/exclusions that does not use
some form of positioning?
Therefore, I don't understand why the "not in scope" arguement is used
when I suggest that the use cases you posted:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Oct/0033.html
should be added. Your list is just as much in scope as dropcap
exclusion or magazine layout, no?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2011 00:17:46 UTC