- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:40:29 -0800
- To: Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed on the WG blog that a new working draft of the Template > Layout Module has been published. This lead me to wonder exactly what > is going on with this spec in relation to the other layout proposals > and what web browsers are actually intending to implement. > > My understanding, probably incomplete, is that Template Layout covers > similar ground to Grid Layout and Regions but that, despite predating > those specs by several years, it has not been implemented in a browser > and there is little prospect of that changing soon. Meanwhile, > experimental implementations of Grid Layout and Regions are > available/in-progress for IE and Webkit. > > I can understand that if people have invested effort into this module > they would not wish to see it die, but if it is not going to be > implemented, and has been supplanted by specs that are, then I would > question the value of the W3C continuing to invest editor resources > updating and publishing it. Would it not be better to retire it and > concentrate efforts on those other specs? It just seems a little > strange, and potentially misleading from an outside perspective, for > the WG to have a layout module that is competing at least partially > with other proposals, and which appears to have lingered for years in > draft status without any progress towards even an experimental > implementation. I agree; I highly doubt that Template Layout will receive any implementation, since Grid is more-or-less identical to it in functionality and is receiving a second experimental implementation. It's somewhat useful as a source of additional ideas, as it has several pieces of additional functionality not present in Grid, but this purpose would be equally served by a wiki page, with less chance of sending a confusing message to the community. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 18:41:17 UTC