- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:23:39 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/08/2011 05:38 AM, John Daggett wrote: > > This was not proposed as an exciting new feature, it was proposed as a > more flexible alternative to the 'full-size-kana' value of the > 'text-transform' property in CSS3 Text. Several members of the group, > myself included, have objected to adding 'full-size-kana' on multiple > occasions. This is clearly an issue which should be marked in the > spec (it still isn't) and we should try to figure out a solution. > > If getting the spec to rec is your main concern, then I suggest we go > with a very simple definition of @text-transform for now, get rid of > 'full-size-kana' and resolve this issue. I agree we can extend the > feature in a later module. I would rather defer full-size-kana from Level 3 than push a poorly- thought-out version of @text-transform to CR. All the issue raised against HÃ¥kon's 'text-replace' proposal also apply to @text-transform. I don't think rushing through this by treating it as a syntactic exercise will resolve those problems. > As a general principle I think we should always be looking for more > flexible approaches to problems, especially where internationalization > issues are concerned. Those are often hard to understand and get > right on the first pass so I think it's better to take an approach > that permits incremental improvements. I think that's a good principle, and I'm not saying we shouldn't do that. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 20:24:16 UTC