W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

RE: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 19:42:09 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D51C9E849DDD0D4EA38C2E539856928412D7E6EB@TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] 
± Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:06 PM
± Also, now it kinda looks odd that no-wrap is the only keyword that doesn't have a -reverse variant.  
± Should we add one for consistency?
± I don't see much *use* for it, but if the lack would be confusing, we can fix it simply.

It's a good observation but I agree that we'll be fine without no-wrap-reverse

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 19:42:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:08 UTC