W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] cross-start/cross-end definition should not be tied to wrap

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:00:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDLknMoCDuMrZq=TBvgRu6PF3qvqppG=BX8ZANSnkV0-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> "The cross-start direction is equivalent to either the "start" or "before"
> direction of the current writing mode, whichever is in the cross-axis, and
> the cross-end direction is the opposite direction ofcross-start."
> The definition is fine, but it shouldn't be defined as part of the wrap
> value since it applies to non-multiline flexboxes. For example, flex-align
> needs to know which side is the start and which is the end even if wrap is
> not specified. I think this should be defined as part of 'column' and 'row'
> instead. Then wrap can just focus on multiline-ness. I think the definition
> of wrap-reverse is fine though.

This is done now, as part of the edit that made flex-flow a shorthand.

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 02:01:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:08 UTC