Re: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >> I agree. There is no benefit in having wrapping and direction in one
> >> property.
> >>
> >> It may still be useful to have flex-flow as a shortcut. Should there be
> >>
> >>  flex-direction: row | column | row-reverse | column-reverse
> >>  flex-wrap: nowrap | wrap | wrap-reverse
> >>  flex-flow: <flex-direction> || <flex-wrap>
> >>
> >> ?
> >
> > This sounds good to me.  I'll make the edits shortly.
>
> I've made the edits.  Currently I'm maintaining the original grammar
> of flex-flow, with "<flex-direction> <flex-wrap>?".  Should I loosen
> it as Alex suggests above?
>
> Also, now it kinda looks odd that no-wrap is the only keyword that
> doesn't have a -reverse variant.  Should we add one for consistency?
> I don't see much *use* for it, but if the lack would be confusing, we
> can fix it simply.
>

What would nowrap-reverse do differently from nowrap?