- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:22:01 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com> wrote: > uranges do exactly what I need, so I could live with them. At the same > time, they are not very human-readable, and it bothers me more here and > in @font. > > Do you have a proposal of a literal variant that would play nicer with > existing things? Unfortunately, no. However, in Lists I decided I didn't really need ranges in the first place, as the people who would be typing a @counter-style rule using some set of non-latin characters would probably have their keyboard set up to make it easy to just type out the full alphabet. It takes about 5 seconds to type out the latin alphabet, and I assume other languages are similar. This reasoning probably applies here as well. (Fonts needs the ranges, because they're often huge and span alphabets.) ~TJ
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 16:22:58 UTC