- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:59:50 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:36:14 +0100, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote: > Christoph Päper: > >> scope: [ phrase || word || [ partial | [ initial || medial || final]# ] >> || character || base || diacritic ]# I think I like this, at least if we leave diacritics out of the discussion for a moment. That said, while the meaning of initial, medial and final is fairly obvious, I wouldn't mind an explanation of the other values. > (This particular example should rather be handled by smart fonts, > methinks, since long s like final sigma should never have gotten Unicode > positions of their own.) Sure, but we have to live with and work around Unicode as it is. I don't think we're likely to get a better alternative any time soon. > PS: CSS properties and descriptors are usually nouns, not verbs, > therefore ‘convert’ is not an optimal choice. Any suggestion? - Florian
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 13:00:18 UTC