W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Overloading pseudo-elements seems bad

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:31:22 +0200
Message-Id: <EC97CEEC-26F1-430C-BAFE-119321A31AE3@crissov.de>
To: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>

Roland Steiner:

> I feel that pseudo-elements for components are a bad idea anyway.

What do you mean by “components”? That is not a term used within CSS specifications as far as I know.

PS: Please try to use thinking instead of feeling (or believing) for technical dicussions. Objections without stated reasons are not helpful.

Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 13:32:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: François REMY: "Re: Overloading pseudo-elements seems bad, was: Need a better way to reach into the shadow DOM subtree"
Previous message: Roland Steiner: "Re: Overloading pseudo-elements seems bad, was: Need a better way to reach into the shadow DOM subtree"
In reply to: Roland Steiner: "Re: Overloading pseudo-elements seems bad, was: Need a better way to reach into the shadow DOM subtree"
Next in thread: François REMY: "Re: Overloading pseudo-elements seems bad, was: Need a better way to reach into the shadow DOM subtree"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:03 UTC