Interpolate after knowing container size information rather than before... -Brian From: Shane Stephens [mailto:shans@google.com] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:55 AM To: Brian Manthos Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; www-style list Subject: Re: [css3-images] Order of color-stop fixup On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com<mailto:brianman@microsoft.com>> wrote: It seems unnecessary and error-prone to do the interpolation twice, in steps (1) and (3). OK, then can you come up with an alternative approach that still conserves "contain" in the example I provided? Cheers, -Shane From: Shane Stephens [mailto:shans@google.com<mailto:shans@google.com>] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:18 PM To: Brian Manthos Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; www-style list Subject: Re: [css3-images] Order of color-stop fixup ... Interpolating container-sensitive properties is still possible, it just takes more work. I outlined how to do it in my previous email, but here it is again: (1) store non-resolved start and end values as part of the interpolated result (e.g. [cover 30%, contain 70%] is the result of a 30% interpolation between a cover gradient and a contain gradient) (2) resolve start and end values against current size of container (3) interpolate resolved values ...Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 12:05:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:03 UTC