- From: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:53:27 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 11:53:53 UTC
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>wrote: > Correct, you have specified two constraints that are conflicting. The > current spec chooses to respect the even distribution over the distribution > length, since satisfying both is not possible. > Well, yes. The point is that either approach breaks a set of constraints and hence "this approach breaks some constraints" is not in and of itself a strong argument against one of the two. Cheers, -Shane > **** > > ** ** > > -Brian**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Shane Stephens [mailto:shans@google.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:18 PM > *To:* Brian Manthos > *Cc:* Tab Atkins Jr.; www-style list > > *Subject:* Re: [css3-images] Order of color-stop fixup**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Example 1:**** > > linear-gradient(red -100%, white, green, black, blue)**** > > ** ** > > Example 2:**** > > linear-gradient(black, red -100%, white, green, black, blue)**** > > ** ** > > Example 1 ED 5.4 current:**** > > linear-gradient(red -100%, white -50%, green 0%, black 50%, blue 100%)**** > > ** ** > > Example 2 ED 5.4 current:**** > > linear-gradient(black 0%, red 0%, white 25%, green 50%, black 75%, blue > 100%)**** > > ** ** > > Why has adding a black stop before my explicitly specified red stop caused > all of my evenly spaced stops to shuffle up? I asked for them to be spaced > between -100% and 100%.**** > > ** ** >
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 11:53:53 UTC