- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:50:16 +1000
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalmage@gmail.com)" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/08/2011 2:04 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > Sigh. > [snip] > None of these references even hints at adding start, end, before or > after as new keywords in the linear-gradient syntax. Did you read the onlist message that proceeded this offlist exchange. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0274.html | Having it begin at the _start_ is correct. Please viewport | this test in IE10. http://css-class.com/test/css/bidi/kanji-test-linear-gradient-media.htm | Resize the viewport either wider or narrower than 800px. | Disregarding the issue with how long a gradient is, | does this show that left can also be confused with top? | Also consider how much worst this is in Mongolian vertical | writing mode. At least _start_ never changes. I am talking about logical start in both instances here. I presume you didn't quite understand what I meant at the time. >> To say that you have never heard of start, end, before, or after >> used with linear gradients until now is false since this is what I >> mentioned to you offlist over a month ago. > > ...you're incorrect. > > > I can forward you the mails offlist if you'd like to discuss > further. You don't have to. I now presume that you were not aware that I was talking about logical values in gradients when I show that test case. Those were the days that this mailing list descended into chaos about gradients (47 messages over 3 days) in the _Summary of recent gradient issues_ thread [1]. I can understand anyone not fully understanding others at this point of time. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/thread.html#msg377 -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 04:50:33 UTC