- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:18:38 -0400
- To: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jcmQbNcFoK92OBz0rgUvd9HOWoFfcKJ0ZkLp1khe-kikA@mail.gmail.com>
There has been no additional comment or discussion on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jul/0501.html idea which provides an object representation that should be fairly easy to create and standard for anything that looks like a rule inline with CSS' forward compatible syntax, but would require a new method. I was having some discussion offline with tab regarding what might be a more palletable idea discussed elsewhere in this thread which would involve using existing apis but a dash prefix for module (like -web-transition) and function (like -web-linear-gradient) and possibly selector pseudos (like -web-nth-match), which actually might work out alright too. The general idea there is simply that in browsers that did not support the native property, you would only see this (as the other would be ignored as per today) but in modern browsers with support you would see both, thus making it fairly easy to check as well as potentially allow divergence and maybe even easily configure to prefer the shim if certain browsers do a sub par job or it caused breaking problems to use native. I don't know if anyone else is up for further discussion, it seems to have kind of fizzled as a topic here. On Saturday, August 6, 2011, Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com> wrote: > Has there been any further discussion on this? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 15:19:06 UTC