- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:38:28 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > Ok, so your concern is whether we should change how the angle syntax renders? > > Because "strictly corner-to-corner or side-to-side" is all that CSS3 Gradients keywords have represented since I've started looking at the EDs/WDs. > > My proposal was to produce the "magic rendering" by mapping the side and corner keyword syntax to an angle appropriate for the ratio of the associated box, and then rendering *exactly* with the angle algorithm that's already documented in the spec. > > Presumably I'm missing something w/r/t your consternation. No, my concern was simply that we might back ourselves into a corner, syntax-wise, by addressing magic corners in the simplest possible manner. Though, if something like "to top left" is acceptable, I'll go ahead and do it. You'd better pass the testsuite, though. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 16:39:15 UTC