- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:03:37 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > Brad Kemper: >> That is a slanted way of characterizing it. The way I see it, >> 'repeating-linear-gradient' is a way of simulating 'background-repeat' >> on a possibly rotated canvas. background-repeat can already create a >> repeating gradient (it just doesn't look good when the gradient path is >> angled). > > Background-repeat has a specific meaning and capabilities. > > Let's not distort the meaning of background-repeat to include "if the <image> is gradient, then adjust the used background-size, apply a transform to that layer of background image rendering, and change the gradient brush such that ...". That isn't what I suggested.
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 19:04:13 UTC