W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [selectors4] prefixed?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:29:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAufPhN2WyPxZEQ5NzVhm_LeRKJegfALJv3RsjCoNix7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that there is a section a section about experimental selectors...
>  I'm assuming that this idea would only hold up for pseudos but it doesn't
> say that.  Can someone offer any more?

In general, yeah.  You can't really prefix a combinator, or a new type
of simple selector.  Luckily, the majority of innovation in Selectors
happens in pseudoclasses and pseudoelements.

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 16:30:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:02 UTC