RE: [css3-images] Resolving on gradient issues

[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
> Can we please not have this discussion?  
If you don't want to answer the question, don't. It stands.

> My intention is to publish an LC draft.  If that involves going through a WD first, whatever.
> That's irrelevant.  
So, how you end up publishing a LC is irrelevant to getting to LC. Riiight. You're as subject
to these rules as everyone else and I want to get a rough idea of the timeline we're talking 
about. If you mind my asking, that's too bad. The question stands.

>The point is, I'm done with Images 3, and would like
> to cut it off and kick it further up the process chain.
Thank you, Captain Obvious! Btw, I'm the guy who has consistently asked you to head that 
way since around TPAC. ('persistently agitating' and all that)

> I'd still like the WG to weigh in on the issues presented in the OP, so I
> can resolve them in the draft.
How does asking a simple process imply this needn't happen ?

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 21:41:38 UTC