W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

RE: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:14:19 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Markus Bruch <macinfo@arcor.de>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D1710FF86@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Tab:
> I am strongly opposed to a 2-[hexa]digit variant, because it has a different expansion rule than the 3-digit hex that already exists.

Doesn't the 1-hexadigit representation have the same concern (different expansion rule than 3-digit hex)?

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 20:14:48 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)"
Previous message: Vincent Hardy: "Re: [css3-regions] Comments on Editor's Draft"
In reply to: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:03 UTC