- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:11 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
voice-volume # silent, x-soft, soft, medium, loud, and x-loud # A sequence of monotonically non-decreasing volume levels. # The value of ‘silent’ is mapped to ‘0’ and ‘x-loud’ is # mapped to ‘100’. The mapping of other values to numerical # volume levels is implementation-dependent and may vary # from one speech synthesizer to another. Because this definition doesn't map 'medium' to anything, it makes it near-impossible for an author to use the absolute values, assuming 'medium' (and not 'x-loud') is user's preferred volume and the author intends to use that as the baseline volume. Afaict, it's unlikely that the absolute scale can be used for anything other than fading from x-loud to silence. Percentages are tricky, because due to nesting, it's not possible to reference against 'medium', which I assume in most cases is what you'd want to do, right? It seems to me that what an author would really need is a scale that varies between "softest audible", "loudest tolerable", and "preferred volume", where each of these are set by the listener. The keywords give you that scale, but there are only 5 points on this scale, as opposed to infinite on the absolute scale, which strikes me as less useful in general... I'm having a hard time understanding how the capabilities of this property would be used, but I suspect it's not matching the authoring story very well. Perhaps you could explain how voice-volume values other than the keywords would be used? ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 07:00:44 UTC