- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:29:01 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr., Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:24:29 -0700: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Leif Halvard Silli > <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: >> But one could be more radical than Tab: a maximum level of 99 should be >> enough as a MUST requirement. Perhaps even less than that. Most lists >> are only made of 3-4 list items. > > No, that's not enough. I've authored lists longer than 99 before (not > by hand, but generated from a database). > > The minimum sensible required implementation limit is 2^15, the > maximum value of a signed 2-byte integer. Ok. I just think that if it is necessary to cut down on what it supported, then I'd rather cut down on the list length than on list formats. Leif
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 14:29:30 UTC