- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:23:24 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Leif Halvard Silli:
> > For laws and other important documents, I'd probably not rely on
> > counters and list styles -- I'd rather write the markers into to the
> > document. Therefore, lists like the above example can still be encoded.
>
> I agree, but what pity? Something wrong with CSS or with HTML?
User style sheets could possibly override list style types and
delete/change the marks. So, if it's very important for the author
that the list style are there, in a certain form, it's probably better
to write them into HTML (or some other source language).
> But one could be more radical than Tab: a maximum level of 99 should be
> enough as a MUST requirement. Perhaps even less than that. Most lists
> are only made of 3-4 list items.
Yes, I'd guess that 99 is enough for 99.99% of all lists.
But I don't see the need to limit the range if we chop section 4.3.
Cheers,
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 11:24:06 UTC